United Nations chief Ban Ki-moon expressed his "outrage" and the President of the General Assembly, Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann, accused Israel of violating international law.
"Gaza is ablaze," he told the UN General Assembly, "it has been turned into a burning hell."
The UN's Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories, Professor Richard Falk, characterized the Israel offensive as containing "severe and massive violations of international humanitarian law."
What other have to say.
Francis A. Boyle, internatonal Attorney said,
"Saying is one thing.", "doing is another."
"You can never trust the United Nations to do the right thing for the Palestinians. "The Palestinians have always been on their own, and they know it.""Abandoned and betrayed by the entire world now for 60 years."
He accused the UN creating the problem in the first place by what he described as the "illegal" partitioning of the Palestine Mandate that led to a massive displacement of the indigenous Arab population.
Boyle, meanwhile, says the legal tools are available to enforce resolutions and international law, but Finkelstein believes it is not simply a question of law, but rather a lack of political will.
"The UN is not impotent," he said. "It chooses to be silent because it is composed of craven slaves of the United States."
Professor George Bisharat from the Hastings College of the Law at the University of California says the United Nations owes the people of Palestine a moral debt.
"The UN is deeply implicated in the injustices and violations of rights of the Palestinians over the last six decades."
"It is not at all clear that the General Assembly had the legal authority to partition Palestine, and the plan it passed in 1947 violated the rights of the indigenous people of Palestine to self-determination.""The United Nations has owed the Palestinian people a moral debt since that time and one that it has never effectively paid.""The UN will likely never become a venue sympathetic to Palestinian rights until it undergoes substantial reform and democratization."
Norman G. Finkelstein, author and political scientist, expressed his frustration at the inaction of global leaders, and the inability of the United Nations to even enforce its own resolutions.
"The world does nothing.""Most states are led by cowards and slaves of the United States. The only ones showing any courage right now are the UN agencies in Gaza. Their representatives are telling the truth."
Under the current circumstances, says Finkelstein, Israel believes it can act with impunity.
"Why should Israel care? The world is doing nothing. The only hope is public opinion, which is light years ahead of the elected representatives."
Dr. Mohammad Marandi, head of the Department of North American Studies at Tehran University shares Finkelstein's low opinion of UN leadership.
"While the UN staff in Gaza are doing heroic work, their statements are not reflected by the higher authorities of the UN or the countries that are represented there.""The only thing that will impact events on the ground is a change of attitude by the United States or an increase in resistance [to US influence] by countries such as Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia.
"It is ironic that the United States considers the UN and the UN Security Council to be legitimate bodies, but their key ally Israel never accepts their resolutions."
The Israeli offensive against Gaza triggered massive anti-Israel protests around the world, and according to Kole Kilibarda, an organizer with the Toronto-based Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid (CAIA), they have an important role to play.
"It is a mistake to view the UN in monolithic terms, and in no way should its actions or inaction serve as a substitute for individuals to organize themselves in their communities to fight and struggle for what they see as just."
"Social change has never come from the UN.""At its best, the UN has only managed to legitimize what social movements had fought for over decades and sometimes centuries."
But Kilibarda says it is clear the Israeli leadership is indifferent to the overwhelming majority of world opinion that has condemned their attack.
"Israel was ready for this reaction and it is obvious that the 'media war' was prepared months in advance in an attempt to prevent a repeat of Israel's PR fiasco during its 2006 attack on Lebanon."
"The fact is Israeli leaders only care about the opinion of politicians in Washington and other world capitals. So long as these governments see a strategic interest in supporting Israeli apartheid as a means of repressing the self-determination of the people living in the Middle East, Israel will continue on its course."
No comments:
Post a Comment